Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that museums and art galleries have a great role to play to connect the masses to their ancestors and historical events. Some people say that a computer can be used in place of these sites. Personally, I am partly in favor of this idea, and I also believe that technology would hardly replace them but supplement them.
Undoubtedly, as computers have been revolutionizing these days, individuals are now able to access to see any types of archives and art works from anywhere. It is possible for remote residents to enjoy these sites without traveling from long distances or paying admission tickets. For instance, a website named Google maps allows people to browse street views through 360 photo technology, which make them feel like they are standing right at this position. Thus, the activity of computing provides individuals a tool for enjoying the historical and art sites just on the screen.
On the other hand, there are two main reasons why museums and art exhibitions are essential today. For one, they help visitors get the feel of rewarding and memorable experiences by organizing various activities requiring participation that is a hard nut to crack for computers to replace. Moreover, more tourists visiting these sites means both the locals and the authorities will benefit from it. In other words, the government can earn incomes through tourism by taxes and then reinvest to innovate these sites so that they can attract more people paying a visit there. Hence, by visiting these places, people have an opportunity to experience all the special features vividly and help this country earn more money.
In conclusion, it seems to me that while computers offer a convenient tool for those who do not have a chance to visit these places, visiting such places in person brings more practical experience and benefits the locals in terms of finance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01602564103 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65964427619 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0589248114 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149775866021 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586268776865 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580325229896 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895970294838 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484263403177 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.