Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In this day and age, despite the alarming status of the environment, recycling is still an unfamiliar activity for many families. Some people argue that laws and policies should be enacted by local authorities to tackle this existing issue. As far as I am concerned, I wholeheartedly concur with the statement, given some crucial benefits that are going to be discussed in the essay.
First, by looking into the current recycling habits of families, it is indisputable that household disposals are being sent to landfills without the essential conduct of recycling. This is massively due to the lack of compulsory requirements for individuals to implement such unfamiliar activities. Moreover, many people consider recycling as a voluntary action rather than a citizen’s responsibility, which leaves them with no need to take up recycling. Therefore, if governments make recycling a legal demand, individuals will be more likely to take part in reusing household appliances since they are obliged to do so.
On the one hand, it is not to abandon the major benefits offered by recycling. First and foremost, with the deteriorating living conditions, recycling would probably act as a pivotal approach to gradually curb the serious effects of global warming and hamper the worsening pollution. Hence, by publishing policies ordering citizens to recycle, officials and politicians will meet the urgent demands to save and protect the environment. In addition, these legal requirements, when combined and applied radically, greatly contribute to the global efforts and international commitments of keeping the world a habitable planet for the upcoming generations.
To conclude, the need to bring recycling into the legal circle is out of the question since it produces a shift in people’s attitudes toward the perplexing environmental problems as well as reinforces united actions to protect the world as a whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45302013423 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14546796839 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5677523138 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.416666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225267684972 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693161483902 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561959136961 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125109376587 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590653601518 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.