Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is widely claimed that recycling household waste is not as enough as it is needed. Many people believe that governments are the only responsible one for increasing the recycle process by considering some rules. I strongly believe that strict laws and rules can be really efficient for rising recycling in every society as people would be recycle more of their rubbish by being forced to obey rules and being more aware of recycling.
To begin with, approving laws about recycling is an effective measure to convince individuals for paying more attention to this issue even if they do not believe in the importance of recycling. Since most people fear from consequences of breaking laws such as serving a sentence or paying fine, they try to obey the rules. Although many people do not care about waste of their home, if some rules oblige them to follow some instructions for ease of recycling, they namely would do them and after a while it would become one of the concerns of the society. To illustrate it, when fastening the seat belt while driving was not compulsory, many people did not care about it, nor did they ignore their careless acts hazards, but after the laws which made it compulsive, it has been one of the habits of drivers.
Moreover, introducing laws for making recycling legal would lead to more educational schemes for increasing the awareness of society about recycling. While governments pass a rule, they would consider some basis acts including advertisements in media and streets, giving some leaflet to people and training courses in schools for educating people. These acts can make people aware of how important recycling is and can teach them what responsibilities they have. For example, advertisements and courses for driving laws can be seen everywhere these days and it has had a great impact on people.
In conclusion, to rise the amount of recycling for waste, governments have the key role by introducing some rules to make it legal since they can force people to do a lot for recycling beside the educational plans which would be done for rising awareness of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- some people think that watching sport is a waste of time.do you agree or disagree? 84
- Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed materials should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, really, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91620111732 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69593449374 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6770221916 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419060510773 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172905361185 0.084324248473 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728103683977 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276895595697 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386336501413 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.