Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely argued that, increase in purchasing common products among people is a result of powerful advertisements rather than the reality of requirements. I strongly agree with the point of view, as individuals implement a wide variety of products with same functions as well as harmful ones without any attention to the consequences.
Nowadays, many people become really influenced by commercial breaks and spend a great deal of money on products which do not have any new aspect for them, while they may have already had other same products. This is because of the main concern of advertising industries that is introducing the product as an absolute new and unique one and overwhelming about the innovation due to convincing the customers for buying it to improve their profits. For instance, although new versions of mobile phones do not have major differences compare to latter version, many try to change their cell phones, even if they have bought it recently, since they are being influenced by vast advertisements.
Moreover, the growing sales of products which are harmful for health shows that people pay more attention to the advertisements, since the drawbacks of goods are not mentioned, nor are the disadvantages shown as the advantages points. To illustrate it, despite all damages of cosmetic products for hair and skin, the number of its users who are impressed by advertisements is growing rapidly, regardless of the bad results may they have.
In conclusion, the power of advertisements is the significant issue in growing the sales of popular products among people who do not care of their requirements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun try seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tries'.
Suggestion: many tries
... differences compare to latter version, many try to change their cell phones, even if th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, really, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16226415094 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02341638479 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.8450840005 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.125 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134879802364 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630981600983 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402722718363 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923181572709 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402446249989 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.