Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped. To what extent do you agree?
It is thought that economic progress is a way to solve poverty. While some hold the view that it is harmful for ecosystem, others disagree. I believe improvement in economy can be helpful for the issue.
Economic growth can make a stable situation for decreasing poverty by offering new measures. It is shown that lots of life aspects has been affected by economy. So, it is a fact that improving in it would rise society life level. Firstly, it can increase job opportunities. Since being jobless is the main reason for becoming poor, making more jobs would help people to make more money and lead them to live better. In recent decades, low jobless rate is noticed in those countries which have had more economic growth. Secondly, improved economy makes a great deal of balance between income and outcome. When a society experience this condition, they will have less poor people. In this situation people are able to buy what they need by paying as well as they catch money. Furthermore, many retired and disabled people live in every country. these people do not have enough abilities to work. improved financial situation will make a ground for helping these group of people to save them from being poor. So, poverty signs would be removed with help of things that have been produced by good economy. As a result of decreasing jobless people and balanced salaries and payments, poverty would be removed. Thus, Spaces between different layers of society will be omitted and everyone can live in a fair condition.
To sum up, improvement in economy is a serious issue which governors should pay attention to solve poverty among people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... disabled people live in every country. these people do not have enough abilities to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 896, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Improved
...e do not have enough abilities to work. improved financial situation will make a ground ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47140868654 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5534072197 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.7894736842 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6842105263 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142367508078 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439858474759 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383583853452 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881727208823 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421399161751 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.