It is widely believed that only a minority of households are involved in reusing the wastes. The proponents of recycling insist that reprocessing rubbish needs to be made legal by governments in order to increase the participations of families. I am totally in favour of this idea and this essay will put forward the reasons of reconditioning of insufficient litters from residences and the significance of imposing a law for remodelling debris.
On the one hand, the most important hindrance is usually due to far locations of drop-off stations where households can leave their packaging wastes for recyclings. Since tons of rubbish are being created by humans on a daily basis, people have to separate the reusable junk from non reusable ones and travel a long distance to the stations for a reprocessing. Unfortunately, major proportions of public perceive this type of culture as time consuming and waste of money because they can utilise the travelling period on other household tasks such as cleaning rooms, watering flowers and so on. In addition, some folks are uneducated and lack knowledge about the significances and complications of drosses. Therefore, it proves why many family members become reluctant in reprocessing the detritus.
On the other hand, enforcing laws may act as an effective deterrent. To illustrate, knowing that people will be punished by heavy fines and long term imprisonments, they are compelled to follow the rules and regulations. In other words, a significant proportion of family tend to control the load of consumptions and eventually maintain a balance in the dispositions. Not only could it prevent domestic members from creating excessive wastes but also companies and factories would be obliged as well, who typically constitute a major percentage in the creation of litters. On top of that, vulnerable atmospheres and ecosystems can be protected by passing laws. For an instance, burning waste materials releases huge amounts of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, which collectively give rise to global warming that is proved to be utterly disastrous to human beings, wild animals and ecological communities.
To conclude, although recycling is not carried out by family members in sufficient numbers, enacting a law can tackle the problem effectively.
Essay evaluation report
a significant proportion of family tend to
a significant proportion of families tend to
companies and factories would be obliged as well, who typically constitute a major percentage in the creation of litters.
companies and factories who typically constitute a major percentage in the creation of litters would be obliged as well.
companies and factories, who typically constitute a major percentage in the creation of litters, would be obliged as well.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 366 350
No. of Characters: 1915 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.374 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.232 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.03 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 89 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.913 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.275 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.491 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.004 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, in other words, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35245901639 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11158524454 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.547217152 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176684540204 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481661278551 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371394491548 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098588931062 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247473825076 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.