Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of the waste?
In recent decades, it has been argued that waste reduction has been receiving a great deal of media attention around the world. However, some people believe that families have not recycled enough their household wastes which may lead to governments should come up with environmental regulations to make them pay more attention. I believe that there are still workable solutions that can be applied for individuals and the government to enhance the environment although environmental laws still play a vital role to make the requirement for the waste reduction.
It is possible that individuals take action without legal requirements to overcome environmental issues. In order to minimize daily wastes and to alleviate the environmental problems in the long term, children should be well-educated to distinguish between non-recyclable and recycled products. For example, young adults need to learn how to separate all waste into different bins and apply waste management in practice at secondary education.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that laws are an important factor in raising people awareness about waste management. Indeed, governments should do more than simply introduce an environmental policy to inspire some fear among the public. For example, extra taxes should be applied to non-recyclable products such as batteries, food contaminated containers because of their harmful effects on the environment. Furthermore, governments could also expenditure on environmental facilities and systems so that whether or not individuals could separate waste effectively in public.
In conclusion, to my mind, there is not the only solution that government adopts policies on increase recycling. Perhaps the government and individuals do need to take responsibilities to cut down unnecessary waste.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 513, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...onmental facilities and systems so that whether or not individuals could separate waste effect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69852941176 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20800658172 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621323529412 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1358803179 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289725111422 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963417971459 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529931264245 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166206765478 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485011958818 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.