Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was

Recycling could be one of the crucial issues in today’s world, if we want to leave this planet for future’s generations. Because of the importance of this fact, some people, including me, believe that the government should carry the burden of recycling by supporting factories and establishing recycling centers.
Although, people play an integral role in the process of recycling such as collecting and separating various types of garbage like as plastic, paper, glass and so forth, it is a big responsibility that could be done with the presence of government and its management. Additionally, nearly most people do not have these circumstances to prevent throwing out trash in sequence of utilizing the old products and using them for making new goods.
Two top goals of recycling might be significant garbage reduction and conservation of materials, which the former leads to less air and water pollution and latter can help to save energy. Both of them needs a huge amount of budget and accurate planning which are not affordable for people only and it would need the authorities’ support. Therefore, with regard to decreasing garbage, government should establish recycling centers for collecting reusable trashes and encourage people to buy suitable containers for recyclable products in order to separate household waste. Additionally, in our globe that energy is known as gold, it is inevitable that stop wasting and also saving energy are pivotal reality. One of the effective method for mentioned purposes is resource conservation, which can be done by government to subsidize factories due to their packaging to make them reusable several times. For example by recycling one aluminum can, we are able to run a television for about 3 hours.
In conclusion, however people play an important role in the process of recycling indirectly, this issue needs the government’s fund and its organized strategy to set up recycling centers and supporting financially.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37060702875 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11858401371 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600638977636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6774631862 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.818181818 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4545454545 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256658799309 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960062036423 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041842192983 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153083374944 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304465950668 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.