Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
What is your position? Discuss both sides in your response.
It is argued whether the authorities or the owners themselves should have the power to design the construction of a new building in huge cities. This essay will discuss both point of view and the reasons why I believe that the owners of estate should be authorized to plan freely their architectures.
On the one hand, a city can be more fascinating if citizens can design their own buildings without restrictions. One of the main reasons is that most people incline to find the best architect whom they can hire with available budgets. Hence, more innovative and beautiful architectures will be created by those architects who try their best to fulfill their client’s expectation. For example, it is this freedom that the genius architect, Gaudi, could introduce the magnificent designs of those churches, privet apartments and gardens to Barcelona in Spain, making the city one of the most attractive place for tourists.
On the other hand, some habitants believe that officers should monitor the designing of a building’s construction to prevent irresponsible designers to construct unsafe architectures, which may danger the people nearby and in the building. However, in my opinion, no one can guarantee that every designer or supervisor from government is responsible vice versa; the best way to solve the safety dilemma is regulating the owners and the designers to take full responsibility even after the construction is built. For instance, the council can formulate a law that the victims of any accident related the building could acclaim compensation from its owners and designers.
In conclusion, there may be the risk on safety issue if the owners can design freely their buildings; nevertheless, the risk can be controlled through proper regulation. Additionally, the freedom of designing their architectures gives the owners motivation to find the best architect, contributing to a more fascinating and magnificent city!
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37785016287 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14581090005 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553745928339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.994710464 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.090909091 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288809477951 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112857687136 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734686609416 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175844235322 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398909677138 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.