Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of job should be highly paid?
Several people these days are gaining a sounding reputation from films, pop music or some sports game that they participated in. Consequently, these celebrities often got a spectacularly high salary as well as several rewarding perks. Nevertheless, a question arises that whether these people are being overpaid. From my perspective, I found no justification against the well-paying of these famous people but hold the belief that some other kinds of occupation are also deserved to have a higher income.
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for celebrities to have a higher wave. One fundamental reason is that they have a specific type of job. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that famous people do not have any period of time for leisure activities, let alone going on a vacation. By the way of exemplifying, the greatest quantities of concerts and shows that a pop musician got are often in the national holidays or festivals, thereby, making them strive for work in during the time that should be for their close-knit ones. Furthermore, being well-known is synonymous with the deprivation of privacy as famous people got paparazzi following them anywhere they go. Therefore, the high-paying can be considered as compensation for their privateness
On the other hand, several other professions should earn a more lofty remuneration due to their contributions. The first and foremost job is teachers. There seems to be a gloomy trust that people working in the educational field are not received an amount of money that worthy of their efforts and merits towards numerous enlightened generations. This results in numerous teachers and professors allegedly resign in order to seek for an alternative occupation. Another employment that is worth mentioning is the garbage collector, who devote their lives to make cities a more hygienic place to live. Grievously, they are irrefutably being looked down by the majority of citizens although, without them, the pernicious impacts on metropolises will be unparalleled
In conclusion, while celebrities deserve to earn an exorbitant income since their jobs are typical, several other occupations such as teachers or garbage collectors should be highly paid since they made a great contribution to the society
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | grahamoneil | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | Simon31 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Kubraguran | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Kubraguran | 56 | view |
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes and possible solutions 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit discuss both these views and give 73
- An increased number of people today change their career and living places in their lives Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Developed countries have created many environmental problems in the World particularly in their contribution to global warming Why is global warming a problem What can be done to reduce the dangers of global warming 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...gest that famous people do not have any period of time for leisure activities, let alone going...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31129476584 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0712386568 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589531680441 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.3969135251 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.533333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188147220931 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559209311958 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383038824853 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112972927375 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234904744298 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.