It is widely argued that purchasing things which are unnecessary or unaffordable can cause people to be in deeply debt. Although there are several factors that may directly lead to such issue, numerous solutions have been sorted out, in order to handle the problem.
To begin with, there are two significant reasons for this behavior. Firstly, one of the most obvious problem is the consumptive lifestyle of people caused by the effect of their parents during their childhood moments. In other words, parents often pamper their offspring by supplying everything that their children offer. Hence, when children turn to incubate, they tend to act to show off their values, by buying luxury goods or following the world richkids’ trends. Another key factor is the appearance of credit cards and its policy. Buying expensive things have no longer been a trouble, since the lending service was allowed in master card and at the end, people get into debt in the most natural way.
However, it is not impossible to tackle the given problem as several promising ideas have been stated. First of all, the measure which should be taken in order to deal with this behavior is the change in policy for money savings. Governments should take part in adjusting the value rate for saving money by peoples’ income. In that way, banking accounts which does not reach the requirements are not available to purchase things. Besides, a punishment should be added, for those who cannot pay in required time. Another case to eradicate this issue is the creation of alternative entertainment beside shopping. Specifically, individuals will have more options in leisure time instead of spending time in mall.
In short, there is a growing in concern that debt becomes more popular when people buying needless and expensive objects, but this issue is in controlled, by some measures mentioned above.
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 2008 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, in short, first of all, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11650485437 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61775292307 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63430420712 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0677174903 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8125 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281484033503 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739728065308 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058584540857 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149850583604 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177554905073 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.