Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education Universities should make it easier for such groups to enrol To what extent do you agree or disagree

In this globalization and technology era, numerous of people have an appropriate opportunity for education easily. However, there are some rural territories that people suffer from lack of facilities and educational institutions. I agree that it might be a useful idea to construct university there but there are other better solutions for this problem.
It is an obvious issue that how technology has changed the methods of teaching. In fact, myriad of pupils prefer to study online courses rather than being in campus due to several positive aspects. Firstly, it is convenient for majority of students to use their portable electronic gadgets (laptop, mobile phone) everywhere. Secondly, there is less wasting in time rather than attending in university specially for commuters. Hence, I believe that professional devices should be provided for poor regions without or with low chance of education.
On the other hand, it is required for all regions to have special centers for education. Naturally, universities and schools are profitable venues for students to learn social behavior, various courses and team working. But it would be impossible for some remote areas with minor population to build universities there. Because, this incident needs enough budget from government and there should be experts and professional tutors for teaching that is unlikely to apply this procedure for whole poor and rural regions. Therefore, government scholarship and free accommodation for pupils who live in awkward situation and they are deprived from modern technology and academic curriculum.
In conclusion, although constructing universities seem an ideal choice for promotion all students in poor and deprived areas, this process is a huge step for country that substantial sum of money will be needed. In this case, other solutions such as spreading e-books and other useful novel devices would be more applied.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gadgets'' or 'gadget's'?
Suggestion: gadgets'; gadget's
...udents to use their portable electronic gadgets laptop, mobile phone everywhere. Second...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46959459459 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8822755466 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4085460053 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.933333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221400929128 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770112872433 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485961441992 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144338697586 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559008297728 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.