Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education. Universities should make it easier for such groups to enrol. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays academic education seems necessary for almost all people, in order to find job or to use new technology developments. Nevertheless, there are still some people who cannot access to a university. But there are disadvantages, and also advantages for that.
First privilege of this happening is that there would be labour force for non-academic jobs. Some vocations are not only do not need graduated workers, but also graduated persons are not willing to do these kind of jobs. For instance, street sweeping known by a society as a low-class job, and someone with academic degree probably would not accept to do that. Therefore, if everybody enrols at college, there would be insufficient labourer for these sort of careers. Besides, universities are usually placed in big cities, as a result of which providing easy access to them leads rural inhabitants to migrate to mega cities. It is proved that increase in migration rate from villages and suburbs to cities is not beneficial due to raise in unemployment rate and overpopulation in cities.
On the other hand, it is one of government's responsibilities to provide free education for all society members, including the wealthy and the poor. All facilities, includes education, should distributed in country scale as much as possible. In addition, going to university definitely makes people more knowledgeable and aware about events and happenings across the country and the world. Consequently, an academic society is more informed and able to make more proper collective decisions, such as in elections.
In conclusion, personally, I am of the opinion that the positive incomes of easing the accessibility to academic education for deprived and rural persons outweigh the drawbacks. This is because it is fundamental for making aware society, and because it is one of government's important duties to look at people equally and try to distribute resources equally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...graduated persons are not willing to do these kind of jobs. For instance, street sweeping ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...here would be insufficient labourer for these sort of careers. Besides, universities are u...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32573289902 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0914918022 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2580329696 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203173699202 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583344294432 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0202297980853 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108502784873 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199584478898 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.