Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Humanbeings need friends in all stages of their living, and there are two ways two have friends, staying with an old one or try to make relationship with a new person. Personally, I believe it is more beneficial to maintain a friend rather than to make new friendly relationships. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in following essay.
First of all, people who are in relation for so many years, have known each other's personality and interests, which is important for enjoying each others' company. Every man and woman has their own characteristics and beliefs, earned during their own life experiences. Satisfaction and amity are come when people, friends specially, respect to these thoughts and try doing what is acceptable in their partner's view and is not in contrast with his/her interests. As a result, being familiar with a person's history and behaviours would cause more happiness in a friendship. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I have friends knowing each other since childhood, as well as ones whom I met recently in college. I maybe have fun with latter and enjoy spending time with them, but whenever I want to converse deeply and express my opinions and ideas, I choose the former and I am more convenient in their presence.
Secondly, Older friends, including colleagues and classmates, are more supportive and helpful, which is a crucial feature in long-term relationships. These type of friends, because of their history, tend more to support each other and compensate each others' past favours. In addition, instinctively, individuals are more commitment to their earlier relationships and attempt to maintain those by backing up their friends whenever it is needed. Young companions, however, have no cogent reason to sacrifice their own benefit in order to help a new so-called friend.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that keeping an aged rooted friendship are more advantageous, and consequently preferable. This is because of the deepest understanding caused by knowing each other for a longer time, as well as the supportive role older friends play in case of immense problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...tion for so many years, have known each others personality and interests, which is imp...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...s, which is important for enjoying each others company. Every man and woman has their ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...sts. As a result, being familiar with a persons history and behaviours would cause more...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09631728045 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97571808499 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586402266289 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.612305709 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4375 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224468598344 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711780836663 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642685366725 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140579273671 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789394136107 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.