Some people prefer to help those people who need it in local communities directly, However, some people prefer to give money to national and international charitable organizations. Which do you think is better ? and why?

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to help those people who need it in local communities directly, However, some people prefer to give money to national and international charitable organizations. Which do you think is better ? and why?

Solacing poor with money is one of the kindest act which elite can do regardless of medium. Local and international organization act as a convenient source in transferring money from affluent to the downtrodden. Both organizations have proved their mettle in many ways but as reliable and convenient resource international organizations have a lot of merits which overweight local agencies. This essay discusses the advantages of international agencies compared to the local ones and will give logical examples to prove the same.

To begin with, Most of the non-international agencies does not hold any credibility and they only aim at amassing wealth by advertising. For example, there is no record of the credited funds and expenses with these organizations. Moreover, these firms are not convenient to approach because they are shattered and unorganized in many ways. This is, indeed make it difficult to transfer money for people and to keep track of the amount.

To embark on, world-renowned organizations are reliable and they are well established. These agencies have a lot of networks and they are spread worldwide. For instance, money donated to these organizations are distributed to the needy and the donor will receive a detailed summary of expenses if required. Besides, convenience and accountability also play a pivotal role in making international organizations more popular. One can easily approach these agencies and regardless of territory border will be able to help others because of their worldwide chains.

After analyzing both, it can be stated that international organizations are more convenient, credible and reliable compared to the other.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4749034749 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28764422085 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7562770432 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107326424306 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375555020458 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329431164941 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607208535673 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385594080061 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.