In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Healthy citizens are the asset of a nation. Food plays a pivotal role in maintaining health but unfortunately, most of the countries people are opting for fast food to save time and money by avoiding the disastrous effect of fast food on health.T his essay agrees with the statement and discusses the pros and cons of the above.
Firstly, Fast foods are affordable, tasty, and convenient. Therefore ,people are ditching their healthy food which comes with a high price tag . For instance, healthy organic food will eat a lot of money whereas fast food is really cheap. Secondly, due to the lack of awareness people are embracing unhealthy food habits which are not good in the long run. For example, fast food can lead to severe health issues like diabetes, obesity, and so on but still people are eating it only because of convenience. Hence, healthy food should be levy less tax than fast food which makes it more accessible.
To continue, if government impose a hectic amount of tax on fast food will eventually force the people to ignore it and they start using organic food.For example, high tax on cigarette compelled people to avoid it. the same way, high tax on fast food will help people to realize the importance of healthy food and ultimately they can stay healthy.
Most importantly, the tax money can be used to treat unhealthy food-related illness. For example, in some countries, the collected levy amount on alcohol is using for the treatment of health problems occurred by drinking alcohol. In the same way, if the government start a scheme to help the people who suffer from food-related alignments would be accepted wisely.
To sum up, High levy on fast food will curtail the use of it and thus avoiding the health issues related to fast food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: T
...isastrous effect of fast food on health.T his essay agrees with the statement and...
^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rdable, tasty, and convenient. Therefore ,people are ditching their healthy food w...
^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y food which comes with a high price tag . For instance, healthy organic food will...
^^
Line 4, column 539, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'levied'?
Suggestion: levied
...venience. Hence, healthy food should be levy less tax than fast food which makes it ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...re it and they start using organic food.For example, high tax on cigarette compelle...
^^^
Line 10, column 17, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (High) must be used with a third-person verb: 'levies'.
Suggestion: levies
... be accepted wisely. To sum up, High levy on fast food will curtail the use of it...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84868421053 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53789129658 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516447368421 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4289513666 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349478162907 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136762349197 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584281792326 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214147443493 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034337966354 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.