In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
These days, whether a higher tax on fast food could reduce the diet-related health problems have sparked a heated debate. Although such issue is contested by many, it is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, but I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance, but the most conspicuous one is that a higher tariff on fast food will raise junk food prices, thus reducing the number of sales. Particularly, the main reasons fast food is consumed by most people are it is cheap, fast and convenient. However, if the price of fast food is higher, customer willingness to pay will be lower. This is because nowadays, there are many healthy foods are on supermarket offering reasonable price and easy way to cook. Obviously, between two items with similar price and same level of convenience, the customers will choose the healthy items.
Another pivotal aspect of this issue is that citizen health has a close relationship with the development of a country. Research shows that due to a high level of fat, sugar and sodium in fast food, high fast food consumption leads to the higher health risks such as diabetes, high cholesterol, and high blood pressure. These illnesses can adversely impact on people productivity, thus affecting the economy of a country. Moreover, studies also show that health care system in Australia and America spends most of their budget on diet-related health problems. Thus, the tax from fast food might be used to cover for the health system.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of introducing tariff on fast foods are too great to ignore. Fast food tax can reduce the number of fast food sales and improve the development of a country through lowering the diet-related health problems and increasing the fund for the health care system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...rmer outdo the latter. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance, bu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94925373134 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67176686108 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525373134328 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8806664127 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296767676709 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102406168627 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077156554302 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18857885784 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495002064186 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.