Leisure activities have increasingly become important as individuals become mentally, emotionally, and physically drained due to their busy environments like work and school. Recent studies show how beneficial hobbies can be, but a controversial topic in their regard is whether it is better to enjoy one's procreation in one's free time or learn practical skills. No one can deny that each has advantages and disadvantages that vary depending on the individual and their way of life. However, if I had to choose, I would prefer to learn practical skills. It is my firm belief for two main reasons, which I will discuss in the subsequent paragraphs.
On the one hand, people are making schedules for their whole day, not only for their working time but also for free time activities. They want to spend their free time well by planning, so they can do everything on their list and enjoy the time. Company staff, for instance, have no time to be with their family members or to do hobbies on weekdays; thus, they have a lot to do at weekends. The answer is yes. As I agree with them, planning helps to keep one entertained at all times.
On the other hand, the preferable side of not planning for leisure time is also common among most. The kind of people who believe in themselves that they can spend their free time without planning as they assume it is just wasting time to planIt is a fact that making plans requires much time to think about the proper activities possible to do at the time. As a result, they begin to take a break rather than make decisions for planning. However, people become challenged, from my point of view, in their free time without any exact purpose. They cannot control the time for the activities.
One group of scholars illustrated how learning new skills without pressure results in long-term benefits. I have to admit my experience is a compelling illustration of this. I am a senior, and since I was little, I have enjoyed drawing, so when I had spare time, I would take the time to sketch daily objects. However, as I got into secondary school, I realized how I wasted my time on simple actions and decided to live smarter. During those times, I would volunteer to be a teacher's assistant for my art teacher. Although I was still in the field of art, through the experience I gained, I learned how to handle children, teach patiently, and clean efficiently. Although it was challenging to be in an environment I had never been to, it was worth it since I could expand my comfort zone. Thus, learning practical skills allows one to use and invest time efficiently.
To conclude, although there are some disadvantages to making plans for people's free time, its advantages prevail them. It would be convenient for workers if an accurate schedule to make lists of activities existed. Aside from these factors, acquiring relevant skills is better than engaging in a hobby because it offers a wide range of benefits, including expanding one's knowledge and having a direct path between academics and work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...regard is whether it is better to enjoy ones procreation in ones free time or learn ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, still, thus, well, for instance, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 24.0651302605 253% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 1615.20841683 156% => OK
No of words: 527.0 315.596192385 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7779886148 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7068801703 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525616698292 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9096106991 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8461538462 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2692307692 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418499983466 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110600244408 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112835773516 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256539673648 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15059141195 0.056905535591 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.