Books are a collection of pages put together to inform or entertain their audience. It has been used for centuries, allowing it to evolve and create a variety of genres. A contentious issue is whether children should read nonfiction or fiction.No one can deny that each has its disadvantages and advantages, but if I had to choose, I would prefer parents to let children read fiction. It is my firm belief for three main reasons.
First and foremost, children are at a vulnerable stage, where they develop and grow into mature adults. Although parents want their children to be academically smart at a young age, it has been scientifically proven that fiction books help their brains develop quickly. I can confirm the statement with my experience when I was in elementary school. I vividly remember many poems and fiction tales like "Red Riding Hood" and the "Three Little Piglets." Through these books, I enhanced my memorization and social skills because I could relate to and discuss the main points with others. As a result, fiction provides more benefits.
One group of scholars shows how academic books can restrict the creativity of children. My niece's early life is a compelling example because her parents narrowed her reading choice to fiction books like autographs and biographies. Although she was considered a gifted child since she knew numerous facts about famous people, she could not perform well in other areas like mathematics and music. The reason is that her limitations led her to have low creativity compared to the average person.
To wrap, children should not be forced to do any kind of actions unless they are harmful because they are simply children. As mentioned above, children like my niece need to explore diversity to help them grow properly but also to succeed independently, and grow their personalities. If their lives are restricted, they will feel the need to have them in a certain way all the time, even if life does not work that way during adulthood. Hence, it is crucial to let children thrive independently, as parents serve as an example and supervisors.
To sum up, parents should not force their children to read non-fiction, but rather both kinds, especially fiction, since it provides a broader range of positive aspects than other kinds of genres.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: No
...ldren should read nonfiction or fiction.No one can deny that each has its disadvan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, well, kind of, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06510416667 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81212261164 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1299473334 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.055555556 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310402852881 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890023202571 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733789363234 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179831145173 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603360663516 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.