Thanks to the sharing nature of the people: less privileged can somehow overcome life challenges with the monetary or non-monetary assistance received from blessed ones. While it is considered by some to donate directly to those affected more beneficial, others prefer to donate money to non-governmental organizations operating at a local or international level. I believe that whether to provide aid directly to the helpless or routing through charities is contingent upon the circumstances.
There are various reasons behind directly approaching the poorer people for aids. Firstly, there are often trust issues that hinder individuals to donate their money to charities such as orphan homes, old houses or hospitals. There have been various incidents of funds embezzlement happened around the world and investigations revealed that the senior management of these organizations was involved. Another point worth mentioning is that donors find it rewarding and stimulating when they put in efforts to find the needy and are involved in the whole process. Finally, it enhances the overall community services and leads to a healthier, peaceful and harmonious society.
However, it has to be acknowledged that the work being performed by non-profits organizations is equally important. The first point worth making is that these firms achieve economies of scale because of their large scale operations and expertise in supply chain management. In case of a natural disaster where a large number of people are affected, the expertise of these firms immensely helps them to source the necessary materials such as food, clothes, blankets, tents, and portable cabin at a much lesser cost that's too within a short notice. Finally, these organizations work on several other important issues such as conserving wildlife and making contributions to these causes is pivotal for the existence of this planet.
In conclusion, I would argue that an individual should make their own choice considering the underlying circumstances and the reputation of the charities. One should keep in mind that in certain scenarios, it is infinitely preferable to make the donations to such organisations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nt. In case of a natural disaster where a large number of people are affected, the expertise of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nd portable cabin at a much lesser cost thats too within a short notice. Finally, the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50892857143 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08209060956 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1662559344 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.214285714 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10703121713 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332799401599 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513361157592 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617553367886 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488683269407 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.