Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations Discuss both views and give ur opinions

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give ur opinions?

While in today life, there are several ways for wealthy people to contribute their money to help to improve the life of unprosperous people in the country. Some choose to buy essential items and give it directly to the community, however, others prefer transferring their money through charity agencies. Both of these methods have negative and positive effects and I will be discussing it in this essay.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons that a large amount of people chooses to donate their money to charity organizations. First of all, charitable institutions are fast, professional and they will make sure that people’s money or items will be delivered to the exact people who really need it. Moreover, the processes are also quite straightforward so people can transfer their money with ease. Furthermore, some people would like to donate anonymously and the charity agencies can provide that.
On the other hand, it is also advantageous to provide direct support to the community because charity organizations are not always trustable. Few charity institutions only transfer a part of the donation money to the community and they kept the remain parts to their own so handing the cash or items directly to people is a more efficient way. For instance, in some provinces of Vietnam, most of the donation money for the poor people often stayed in the pocket of charity organizations leaders. Moreover, there are also fraud agencies created to scam people’s money and then disappear without any traces. Thus, not only the money could not reach the hand of needy people, but the donator also suffered from the loss of their money.
In conclusion, from my point of view, it is undeniable that charity agencies are fast and convenient, however, direct donate is more reliable and safer for the donators.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (36 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...on money to the community and they kept the remain parts to their own so handing the cash ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05629139073 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76132933487 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5298379609 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245047271611 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886280177172 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570098745566 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144500204227 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758684649336 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.