Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time.
The decrease in the number of people who spend time walking every day is now a concerning problem in many countries. There are several reasons and solutions for this issue and I will be discussing it in this essay.
There are two main reasons for this change in people’s routine. First of all, people are now having a different working schedule than they used to have in the past which makes it difficult for them to spend time walking. They usually go to walk early and come back home quite late, thus, they are only able to spend their free time which is already very limited to do their hobbies or relaxing. Moreover, due to the rapid development of economic, many countries have to cope with air pollution. Air pollution that might damage people’s breathing system, so people might avoid walking outside in order to keep their body safe. For instance, In Bejing, most people have to buy plenty of respirator mask when they go outside of their house because the air pollution level in this city is extremely high.
Even though it is hard to encourage people to maintain the walking routine, several solutions still available to solve it. Firstly, upgrading facilities is one of the most efficient solutions this problem. The government should build more park and have more tree planted across the road to purify the air so more people could feel safe when they go outside to walk every day. Secondly, popularize the benefits of walking to citizens using the internet or creating walking competition is also an excellent idea. Due to this action, people could understand the advantage of walking every day and they might feel excited to make walking as they daily basic.
In conclusion, the disappearance of walking routine might cause some negative effects for both the citizens as well as the society, however, the government could fix this problem using several solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun respirator seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of respirators'.
Suggestion: plenty of respirators
...nce, In Bejing, most people have to buy plenty of respirator mask when they go outside of their hous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... negative effects for both the citizens as well as the society, however, the government co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.934375 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50572586477 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553125 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6005454802 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225744304457 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796519863466 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515682086369 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125808692519 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594566358369 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.