The tradition that famliy gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?
In the modern life, families do not have foods together as they used to be in the past. This change led to several problems on either families or societies. In this essay, I will be discussing these problems along with the causes of this concerning change in tradition.
There are various factors contributed to the transformation of family’s eating habits. Firstly, due to the difference between work and study schedule in the present and the past, family members are now no longer be able to go home at the same time so it is difficult for them to have meals together. Secondly, the intense amount of works is also made a huge impact on this change in family’s eating. Employees or even the CEO of the company often go home late because there are plenty of works to deal with, as a result, they usually buy foods online and eat while they are doing their tasks. Finally, since the invention of fast foods, people are likely to eat at the fast foods stores rather than cooking at home because of it convenient. For instance, in Vietnam, many parents give their children money to buy fast foods so instead of going home and cook lunch or dinner for them, they will stay at their company to finish their businesses.
This tradition alteration has caused several issues both in families and the society. Since people no longer gather for meals, they will not be able to share their stories and the bond between family members will be faded by time. The understanding between parents and their children are also be limited and eventually, at some point, parents will no longer understand their children which would create conflicts. Moreover, the disappearance of this tradition will make a huge impact on the society since in special occasions people do not feel the need to organize a family reunion so these occasions might be forgotten in the future.
In conclusion, the transformation of family meals is the result of myriad factors which have caused several in the families as well as in societies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79597701149 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5825820702 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497126436782 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4249796374 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122610206268 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544430470201 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404716531565 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835617148646 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178779525344 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.