Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers while others prefer local markets. What are the advantages of each? Which shopping experience do you prefer?
A form of shopping that has recently emerged and has been speculated to replace outdoor markets is shopping malls. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that people shop at malls for the sake of convenience. On the other hand, hardly are local market concepts of bygone days.
To assess the reason why people are seemingly attracted to shopping centres, we must bring the technological development into focus. Assuming we were to buy something in a rush, it would be the shelves of good being neatly arranged by categories that allow us to look for what we need effortlessly. In addition, our shopping experience not only is more hygienic, due to freezers and cooling systems, but the food also is of higher quality because it has to undergo strict inspection. Having chosen the items of interest, customers can have those items conveniently delivered to their front door. They do not even have to bring cash as virtually all shopping centers accept plastic money such as credit cards and Apple Wallet.
Although it is easy to see that shopping malls are gaining popularity, we must also put the benefits of local markets into perspective before judging whether one is better than the other. Unlike foods that are frozen, which let them stay longer on the aisles of shopping centers as well as supermarkets, foods from traditional brick and mortar open-air markets are freshly picked from the farms and sold only during the day. Besides, market-goers can negotiate the price in an attempt to find the most affordable one for their budgets. Meanwhile, the cost of an item in a retailer shop is both fixed and expensive most of the time. Another benefit which shopping centers do not offer is making a purchase without to park personal vehicles. For instance, it is not surprising to find a Vietnamese riding his motorbike to do the weekly shopping from one stall to another in a local market.
Taking into account the advantages of shopping at the mall and the local market, I arrive at the conclusion that both of the shopping locations are equally effective and equally meet my needs. Thinking shopping centers will one day replace local markets is an interesting notion, but I believe this will not happen for many years to come.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-07 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- There is no need to go out to see live cinema because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of a large extended family Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Directors and managers of organisations are often older people Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are hardly
...sake of convenience. On the other hand, hardly are local market concepts of bygone days. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as credit cards and Apple Wallet. Although it is easy to see that shopping...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, look, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8664921466 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60316458018 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573298429319 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3499116925 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.1875 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329049869289 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110509548355 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057036387376 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209060533639 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421083913612 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.