Some people prefer to work for a large company. Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer?
A question concerning employment that many have to face is whether they should pursue their promising career at a major firm or a modest one. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that as an individual works for a company of large scale, he will be given favourable opportunities of advancement. On the other hand, hardly can we deny that it is more feasible to apply at smaller business establishments.
To assess the potential advantages of being employed by large corporations, we must bring the amount of income as well as other perks into focus. Assuming a person passed the recruiting process at gigantic organizations such as Apple or Google, he would no longer be concerned about his financial situation. Not only is he able to do his job in a professional office environment, but the first-class facilities also cater for virtually all of his needs. In addition, meeting potential investors in both domestic and international ones will open opportunities for business collaboration. Another benefit is whenever a worker decides to job hop, his resume will be noticed straightforwardly by headhunter of the competitor companies.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that working in gigantic organizations seems to be more attractive, we must put salient points of smaller ones into perspective before judging which one is better. Not having as much to lose as big businesses, small-scale businesses will take more risks and are not afraid to allow more creativity, along with freedom, when it comes to decision-making. For instance, workers are under less stress because the goals of the company require fewer efforts to attain. On top of that, seniors of universities are warmly welcomed to gain apprenticeship experience at small businesses, whereas the bigger ones shy away from or even get rid of those students.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that there are pros and cons to each of the sides. Regardless of the size of the workplace, I truly suppose that it all comes down to personal preferences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cilities also cater for virtually all of his needs. In addition, meeting potentia...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09384164223 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15987813876 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633431085044 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8133106528 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.071428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128888615494 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413377504368 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491296452365 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695773267009 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044096654957 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.