Some people prefer to work for the large company, while others prefer to work for the small company. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
With the proliferation of contemporary society breeds a wide range of choice to develop the career path. Indeed, the question of whether it is better to be employed by a large company, or by small one remains a source of controversy. Although participating in a small and medium- size business is beneficial to some extents, I would argue that working for the large enterprise offers more advantages
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people should apply for the small firms. Firstly, the people who chose to work for these companies could be promoted quickly than these working for the larger corporations. To be more specific, the working environment is less competitive in the small enterprises due to the limited number of employees. As a result of this the staffs could have an good opportunity to be a manager, which may help them to gain many important skills and leadership skill is a case of point. Secondly, in small business, people could be easier to build the relationship with their other colleagues, especially with the senior manager. These personal contacts can be a great benefit for them in the further career.
On the other hand, I believe that in spite of numerous advantages of taking part in small enterprises, working for the large companies results in more favorable outcomes. The most obvious of which are related to job security and the improvement in specialized knowledge. With regard to the former, the employees in the large firms will enjoy a higher degree of job security. This is due to the fact that profitable companies are less likely to go bankrupt than small start – up operations. Another advantage is that that larger enterprises could provide a well-develop training programs, which are designed to provide the knowledge in the certain fields for the employees. This may help them to obtain plenty of essential skills in their chosen profession.
In conclusion, working for small companies may be advantageous in some ways, it seems to me that applying for the large organizations is a wiser choice to guarantee a successful career in the future.
-
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
With the proliferation of contemporary s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ice to develop the career path. Indeed, the question of whether it is better to be employed by a large ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge enterprise offers more advantages On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... a result of this the staffs could have an good opportunity to be a manager, which...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enefit for them in the further career. On the other hand, I believe that in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial skills in their chosen profession. In conclusion, working for small comp...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l career in the future. -
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06534090909 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87923237244 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525568181818 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6022408436 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268194640647 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853893379092 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829664177607 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179617144317 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348667756839 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.