Advertisement has always been an effective method for promoting products. Many people view it as an essential part in marketing to increase sales, while others consider it an old fashioned way of persuation. From my view, I believe both claims are acceptable and this essay will thoroughly explain both views with supported evidence.
To begin with, no one can deny the successful impact promotion leaves on one's brain and conviction. The way through which advertisements are presented is its core strength, espacially that what we only see in a commercial is the bright side of the targeted product and how it is properly used. We can take promoting a fresh juice as an example, which always includes an act of people enjoying a cold bottle of juice on the sea shore on a melting summer afternoon, resulting in making this product seem more diserable for the observer so that he or she immediately purchases it. And that's how advertising has a fundemental role in catching consumers' attention.
However, despite the fact of how beneficial advertisements are, it is obvious that it had lost some of its influence due to traditionality. In other words, many companies adapt relatively similar methods when promoting a product, and so people got used to the same pattern of advertising wheather it was on radio, TV channels or even social media platforms. Consequently, boredom toward these commercials grew in people and lost interest that they would either ignore listening to them or just skip them.
To conclude, in my opinion, adverstising can absolutely regain its powerful influence in convincing buyers if some interesting changes and creativity were applied on the presentation methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...he or she immediately purchases it. And thats how advertising has a fundemental role ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 639, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...sing has a fundemental role in catching consumers attention. However, despite the fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, while, even so, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16304347826 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01959877974 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677536231884 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2782802872 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.545454545 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177451306318 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590826944746 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225740975418 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955733657978 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338099096888 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.