Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Currently, it is a controversial issue in terms of improving public health whether building additional sports amenities or requiring other measures. In my opinion, there are strong views on both sides, which I will outline now.
On the one hand, some people consider that there should be extra methods required to improve public health. For one thing, in modern life, environmental deterioration affects directly to people and undermines their health such as water and air pollution. In addition, with more constant greenhouse gas emission, the number of people faces lung cancer is five times higher than they did ten years ago, for example. Governments, therefore, should encourage citizens to use car-sharing programs or public transport instead of private cars. As for water pollution, factories should install waste treatment systems to avoid discharging toxic chemicals into rivers, which has detrimental impacts on the habitat of marine creatures and the health of people.
On the other hand, some individuals believe that providing numerous sports facilities is the most effective way to enable everyone to stay healthy. To clarify, there is a significant sum of money invested to build luxurious sports centers and supply cutting-edge sports equipment. Hence, this creates an opportunity for the public to do exercise. For instance, exercise lovers work out after a hard day at work to relieve stress and keep in good shape, or teenagers and elderly people love going to the gym in their free time at sports amenities to build up their stamina.
To sum up, besides building mainly more sports facilities, I agree that it is more critical for measures from governments and factories to be adopted, for it can help people maintain their health and protect them against the negative effects of environmental pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, so, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, for one thing, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33103448276 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79211561927 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648275862069 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1588915995 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249339770931 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09197038816 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708045603594 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148068812809 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046645321106 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.