Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is some dispute whether adding sports equipment would enhance the general health of citizens. This trend have both merits and drawbacks which will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, there are unarguable benefits attached to providing free access the public with sports devices. The first rationale in support of this view is that the local are likely to take advantage of the available facilities rather than spend part of their income on the gym. This would save sports enthusiasts certain amount of money in order to invest in other priorities. An additional point is that entry to public exercise equipment would encourage the young to participate in physical activities. This helps ameliorate impacts of popular sedentary lifestyle, and supply these youngster with spots to socialize. Finally, given recreational areas expanded, local inhabitants are given oppotunities to broaden their social circle and a sense of social solidarity. Thus, local people are the most benefficial when the authorities allocate to sports equipment in public areas.
Conversely, sometimes funding for public facilies is misspent and lack of maintenance would result in degration and depletion of these equipment. Purchase of unneeded devices and disregard the local demographic may lead to ignorance of local individuals to these free of charge facilities. To illustrate, it would be wasteful to install treadmill in neigborhood where mostly inhabitants are the elderly. More importantly, without the regular care of responsible individuals, the exercise places may be torn down very quickly that is a waste of public resources.
In the light of these facts, availbility of open public devices would save people's financial resource from gym expenditure, negative impacts from modern way of life and support communal lifestyle. However, the public revenue could be wasted and equipment could be damaged without appropriate maintainance. In my opinion, any attempt to raise physical health of the general public should be credited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... general health of citizens. This trend have both merits and drawbacks which will be...
^^^^
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...This helps ameliorate impacts of popular sedentary lifestyle, and supply these yo...
^^
Line 2, column 585, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this youngster' or 'these youngsters'?
Suggestion: this youngster; these youngsters
...opular sedentary lifestyle, and supply these youngster with spots to socialize. Finally, given...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 853, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...ficial when the authorities allocate to sports equipment in public areas. Conversely,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
...ld result in degration and depletion of these equipment. Purchase of unneeded devices and disre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tants are the elderly. More importantly, without the regular care of responsible ...
^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...attempt to raise physical health of the general public should be credited.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52411575563 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86331110254 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601286173633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0724330195 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237239858139 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714344826551 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395780425754 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137664223466 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337734804234 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.