Some people say that giving a smaller amount of money weekly to children will help them become more capable of managing their money as they grow older. Do you agree or disagree?
An encouraging habit that will sharpen children’s skills regarding personal finance in the long run is providing pocket money. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that as children are given a little amount of money, they will effortlessly gain knowledge and financial concepts. On the other hand, hardly can we deny that there are so many potential downsides which negatively affect the spending habit of those children.
To assess the reason why more and more parents giving their children money on a daily basis, we must bring the considerable advantages into focus. Assuming a child was struggling to cope with the heavy workload from school, buying some new toys or spending on a night out with friends would be therapeutic for his or her mental health. In fact, not only can youngsters have a sum of money at their disposal, but they also have a fund in case of emergency. In addition, it is significant to shower our close ones with presents by the money that we saved up over a period of time. Another event that might require any individuals to have some amount of money with them is philanthropic activities, such as the case we donate to the impoverished beggars.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that allowing kids to have money in their pocket, we must put the downside effects of this teaching method into perspective before judging whether every parent should follow it or not. Overspending money on antisocial or even illegal activities such as addictive games or drugs, children will absolutely ruin their future and become a disappointment to their family reputation. Moreover, spoiled adolescence might be appealed by social vice and gather with bad friends at parties all day without progressing their academic and personal growth. On top of that, because of receiving money without having to work, the kids failed to realize how much effort their parents have put into, and therefore those kids express no appreciation to the value of money.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that in principle, giving schoolchildren money can be a way to teach money management but in practice, it may also lead children to the wrong path of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fund in case of emergency. In addition, it is significant to shower our close on...
^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ts by the money that we saved up over a period of time. Another event that might require any i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt to their family reputation. Moreover, spoiled adolescence might be appealed by...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95978552279 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75984495446 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611260053619 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4086658947 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.307692308 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6923076923 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26988004384 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987480052951 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578912751179 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165315032826 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150224081829 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.