There are some believes that it would be more beneficial to raze down historic places and replace them with new buildings. I definitely disagree with this idea because of some apparent reasons that I discuss about.
Generally, culture and custom of a country depend on historic constructions that are valuable evidences from our ancestors. If government destroy all ancient places, history and majority of cultures will be forgotten gradually. Furthermore, every territory has archaic religious venues to hold eminent rituals that are worthwhile. Hence, many sacred temples that are special buildings for worship will be demolished, on condition that government convert them with modern towers or skyscrapers.
In addition, economy of many countries largely link to the tourism industry that historical buildings play a crucial role. In fact, old constructions are exceedingly alluring and attractive for numerous tourists and visitors around the world who heed about archaeology and history. For instant, Italy and turkey are obvious and popular samples for tourism regions because of ample historical places such as monuments or churches. Meanwhile, financial and commercial issues of countries are influenced positively by visitors.
Although modern buildings are extremely appealing for some people and they are in-synch with current time, we cannot authorize to the government to break down entire historic constructions. Instead of devastating, they can renovate old and fragile places as treasure of country which belong to former generations.
In conclusion, I strongly assert that whole ancient buildings are valuable enough to be preserved precisely and government should pay more attention due to economic benefits and great merit that they have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are influenced positively by visitors. Although modern buildings are extremely ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7072243346 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88579880166 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5953788343 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301615461547 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877990303778 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926541779685 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15245250273 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658466893339 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.