Nowadays, some people claim that history is one of the significant educational subjects while other believe that science and technology have priority over history. In my opinion, science and technology play a vital role in today’s world rather than history.
Some people assert that science and technology are the predominant and fast growing area in upcoming year. Also they advocate that these fields have broad application in modern life of today. Thus, it is not possible to address and accomplish a lot of routine tasks without sufficient science and technology knowledge about them. I completely agree about strong preference of science and technology in educational issues over history. Because teaching these fields help students to adjust with advanced and progressive world faster and adapt with it.
But other people state that history assist them to make fewer mistakes, because they can learn from history and it push them to avoid faults which were done by their ancestors. As a matter of fact, they believe that pervious times shows patterns of behavior or events in the past and their outcome which can help human to eschew similar outcomes in future. But if we could actually learn from history, it would not be full of the same repeated wrongs. However, the same mistakes are made again and again which make history irrelevant to learn for future.
In conclusion, although some people believe history is an important topic in school matters, science and technology have more paramount importance because they are dominant fields in human life today. In my point of view, school should pay particular attention to science and technology subjects based on their pivotal influence in diverse aspects of human life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and fast growing area in upcoming year. Also they advocate that these fields have br...
^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pushes'?
Suggestion: pushes
...ause they can learn from history and it push them to avoid faults which were done by...
^^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n help human to eschew similar outcomes in future. But if we could actually learn from hi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22857142857 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52441142867 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3634001215 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314542982427 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10629518688 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895490711178 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205296265708 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106463562055 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.