Some people say that it is impossible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Whether a country could reach the balance between economic development and environmental protection has caused a controversial debate. While it is a task of the challenge for every government, I hold a firm belief that each nation can reach this target by several effective ways.
On the one hand, the economic evolution and environmental preservation are more likely to two distinct notions, which seems incompatible in developing countries. Firstly, by the burden of taking care millions of people who are starving, those governments feel the economy is much more important than saving natural resources. Therefore, in third world countries, the expectation of sharing the green concern with developed countries is unreality due to the ambition of industrial race. Rapid industrialisation put more pressure into the environment by pouring carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The natural habitat would be negatively affected by the unsustainable development in these countries.
While many people are skeptical about the existence of sustainable development, I am in support of the opinion that human can make the economic progress combines with environmental care. In the fast-pace-life, the government can apply the innovated technologies, which improve the waste treatment system. No sooner has the central authorities launched a full-scale investigation into green technology than they can both gain successful in industrial revolution and unpolluted habitat. In addition, with the strong international commitment and be promoting the public’s conscious, the green development can be achieved. For example, encouraging each individual to utilize renewable resources, setting the limit on using disposable products and imposing a strict restriction to make people more environmentally responsible can contribute to the improvement of the country as well as the natural surroundings.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that having a profitable economy without environmental deterioration is difficult to achieve, but this is not an indication of unattainable objective, especially if the government take some proactive measures to accomplish it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, third, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86942675159 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45367592554 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630573248408 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5406576858 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.769230769 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165974122141 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504099425841 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334099704028 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880158121523 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332613377592 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.