Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.
Discuss bother these views and give your opinion.
Opinions regarding the consequences of environmental issues are divided. Some claim that the severe loss of vegetation and wildlife need to be prioritized, while others contend that there are more adverse effects on other problems such as natural disasters. I agree with the latter that natural disasters are worth worrying about. However, the disappearances of plants and animals are the issues at which people need to consider.
It is understandable why people believe that catastrophic natural disasters are strongly linked with climate change. With the increasing temperature, specifically the oceans, the occurrence of tsunamis, hurricanes, and so on has frequently happened in the last two decades. Take a supporting example, one need look no further than the 2004 tsunami that occurred in Malaysia and Thailand which is extremely destructive. The frightening tsunami resulted in thousands of deaths, injuries, and the loss of billions of dollars, the effects of which turned those two developing nations back economically for years. Thus, this example bears testimony to the drawbacks of natural disasters, which are primarily caused by global warming and climate change.
In addition, the reason why many people, including me, believe that the loss of plants and animals is due to the increasing numbers of endangered species in recent years. Wildlife has a crucial role in balancing the ecosystem and is also known as a source-contributor to people’s lives in several aspects, namely industry, economy, and basic needs. However, environmental issues, for instance, deforestation has heavily destroyed the ecosystems, leads to the impoverishment of vegetation and wild animals. Take a look into the aforementioned issue, people’s overexploitation has resulted in reducing numbers of trees, wildfires. Consequently, the extinction rate of animals increased rapidly, as there were no homes and sufficient food to maintain their lives.
In conclusion, while I agree that a worsening environment leads to unexpected disasters, I still believe that the dropping in numbers of plants and wild animals is extraordinarily serious and needs to be put into consideration.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, regarding, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65349544073 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25746256335 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565349544073 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0911180919 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1462989163 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452308475718 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476732856501 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887771065973 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697718350435 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.