Some people opine that music is advantageous in uniting people from different cultural and age background. I personally agree that music is beneficial in joining people from various cultural and age backgrounds because of several reasons.
Firstly, music serves as a common interest between people. This is because music can be enjoyed by anyone from different age groups and cultural backgrounds. There is no limitation of who can listen to music or being a fan of some music groups. This then lead to music becomes a common interest for people to unite and to befriend. For example, a band named Queen has a lot of fans from young to old people. As a result, when they meet, they can talk about Queen's songs and albums, which will make them to befriend easier.
Secondly, music is often being used to communicate messages. This is because, a lot of people often feel shy or scared to say something directly to other people. Thus, they use music, which has lyrics that represent their feelings, to express their feelings to other people. It can be expressed by sending them to addressed people, or by putting the music in social media with a hope that the addressed people will see and get the messages. As a result, a lot of addressed people usually can understand the messages and feel connected with the song. This has happened many times which resulted in music becoming one of the most popular communication bridges between people. For instance, Chris wants to confess his feelings to his crush but he is too scared to say it directly. Then he sends ILYSB song, which is produced by LANY band, to his crush. Consequently, his crush finally understand about Chris' feelings and accepts his confession. This song has helped Chris to communicate the message that he was too scared to say.
In conclusion, I completely agree that music is a great way in uniting people from various cultural and age backgrounds because music serves as a common interest between people and music is often being used to communicate messages.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85878962536 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58697505475 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466858789625 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6212520257 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7368421053 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273844416113 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959339757476 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106798821763 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233417677702 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112522699275 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.