It is believed by some people that people of various age groups and cultures can be brought together with the help of music. In my opinion, I agree with this point of view which has few exceptions.
To start with traditional music of a country helps in bringing together people of different ages in that country. The reason why those people like that music is that it reflects their culture. Also, it teaches them many moral values like co-operation, kindness and friendship. In addition, there are many young people who are interested in listening to old songs which belong to their previous generation as these songs have some meaning rather than the new songs which do not have any meaning. Old music depicts the emotions of people such as happiness, sadness or excitement. So, this music helps in creating bonds been people of mixed ages.
Also, music helps in buildings relationships among people of different cultures. It helps in making people understand the value of many cultures which makes them develop respect towards people of other cultures. For instance, most of the people in Asian countries like western music of USA like pop music or rap music. Some people visit USA to attend live concerts of western music though they do not belong to that country. This way people of different cultures can meet and develop bonds.
However, music can also cause frictions among people of different ages and cultures if their preferences differ. For instance, many older people like traditional music, but many teenagers like modern music. This can create misunderstanding among these people and impact their relations.
In conclusion, music is a better way to build cooperation among the people of different ages and cultures except in few cases where people have different music interests.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09764309764 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54965982595 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6065236433 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0588235294 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438048413733 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171415800725 0.084324248473 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904921637678 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297819308264 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482965503399 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.