Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Society does not need to make extraordinary efforts to save endangered species. The people in the society do not need to spend much money or time to save every plant and animal species if they perform their duties responsibly without causing disturbance to the nature.
Firstly, people need to perform their duties responsibly like protecting the nature in the possible ways. People can plant trees in the surroundings which helps in preserving the nature. If they preserve the nature, then the nature helps in saving the most of the plant and animal species since these species mostly depend on the nature for their food and survival. Most of the species are becoming endangered because of the changes in the environment, shortage of food and water. If the people in the society do not pollute the environment or indirectly causes changes in the environment, then people in the society need not make extraordinary efforts to save endangered species.
Everyone in the society cannot make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species. For instance, there are many poor people in the society who work hard to get their food and for their survival. If those poor people have to make extraordinary efforts, despite the expense in financial, then their survival becomes difficult. In some cases, they may face shortage of food because of them spending less time in earning income or spending more amount for saving endangered species. There are many busy people in this society who spend a lot of time in their jobs and can't afford their time for saving endangered species. Scientists might spend months or years together for their inventions and they cannot afford their time protecting every plant and animal species since their inventions are necessary for the society. These people who cannot afford more time or money can help save plant and animal species by any other efforts like planting trees in their surroundings or keeping their surrounding clean.
However, people in the society should make their efforts in saving plant and animal species. They can spend the amount of money or time which they can afford for saving plant and animal species. They can help the people who try to save endangered species by providing them some money needed in saving endangered species. People in the society should not pollute the nature which causes harm to plant and animal species.
Society need not make extraordinary efforts to save endangered species. They can make small efforts like spending small amount of money or spending some of their time to save plant and animal species. If the people in the society do not pollute the environment, then the nature helps in protecting the plant and animal species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o spend a lot of time in their jobs and cant afford their time for saving endangered...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04585152838 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50542878463 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.299126637555 0.4932671777 61% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0834330533 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.047619048 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38095238095 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358774761614 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159588675305 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950011667739 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278553397385 0.150359130593 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537204790739 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.38706741573 78% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.