Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema.
Technology has evolved drastically in the last couple of years, especially in the mobile phone segment. A few people say that they don’t feel the necessity to go to a movie hall to watch a film when they can watch them on their gadgets, where as another few feel that movies have to be watched in theatres to get real movie experience. In my opinion, films are to be watched in cinema halls to get a feel of watching the movie.
Handheld devices nowadays are considered as an entertainment device, rather than just using it for communication purpose. Phones are that are launched today are often seen with enormous screen sizes. The main reason for mobiles having bigger screens are that people demand it so that they can watch movies, shows and other entertainments. Online streaming sites and applications such as Netflix and amazon prime provide all the latest movies and people can effortlessly access them on their mobiles irrespective of where they are. For instance, a person travelling on a flight can pre download a movie which he wished to watch and can enjoy it later on his mobile or tablet. Another benefit is that you can pause and play the movie when ever during his free time, indeed this is the benefit of watching movie on mobile, all these are available right on the fingertip. A person can save his money and time by not travelling in heavy traffic to watch a movie, when the same is accessible on his mobile.
On the flip side, like other few people’s view I agree that a movie can be enjoyed fully when it is watched in a cinema hall. As technology in movies also have evolved, we get an enhanced experience watching those movies in movie halls. Movies today use various technologies such as 3D, dolby digital sounds, and imax experience. To get the feel of such movies, these must be watched only in a theatre because these cannot be experienced when watched on a mobile or tablet. People feel complacent after watching a movie in a theatre when compared to viewing them on their gizmos.
In conclusion, certain movies must be watched only in movie halls to get a real satisfaction of the movie. In my view mobiles can never be replaced for viewing movies that are released with special theologies such as 3d etc. How many of them will prefer watching a movie like avatar on a mobile?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | sharath957 | 80 | view |
- These days, mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways in whichpeople relate to one another socially. Do the advantages of this development outweigh thedisadvantages? 87
- In many countries around the world shopping has turned into a form of entertainment rather than a way of getting what people need Discuss the reason for this trend Is it a positive or negative development 85
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution Discuss both views and give your opinion 91
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women. To what extent doyou agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...n they can watch them on their gadgets, where as another few feel that movies have to be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun feel seems to be countable; consider using: 'few feels'.
Suggestion: few feels
...them on their gadgets, where as another few feel that movies have to be watched in theat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6756097561 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57933604247 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485365853659 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5386552087 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150797014773 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567279459939 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544023370404 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105600815131 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428237498256 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.