Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people prefer watching movies on their smart devices rather than going to the theater; however, there are still many others who insist that a movie should be watched at the cinema for a better experience. While watching films at home using various handheld devices offer a plethora of benefits for viewers, I personally believe that nothing can beat the thrill of physical contact with the silver screen.
On the one hand, convenience is the most important factor for people who prefer to watch movies on their smartphones or tablets. On advanced electronic gadgets, anyone can enjoy any movie of their choice at a time and place comfortable to them. People can also decide how they should sit or what they should wear proactively while watching it. Furthermore, these smart technologies also provide the option of shipping entire scenes that the viewer finds boring. Another reason for people not going to a multiplex is the introduction of online movie libraries for rentals as well as downloads at affordable prices. For instance, iTunes and Netflix have jumped into this area to offer customers economical options to buy or rent movies, making any program just a click away.
On the other hand, none of the aforementioned benefits can replace full enjoyment when watching films at cinemas. The advanced digital effects and the surrounding sound system do affect the atmosphere and the attraction of the film which satisfies the audiences. Movies based on animation and using three-dimensional technology will make an impact on people only when they experience such movies in theaters. Moreover, the lack of distractions in a cinema makes the movie more engaged and connected to the viewers. When entering a movie theater, moviegoers must turn off their phones and requested to keep silent throughout the movie.
In conclusion, some people believe that cinema’s popularity seems to decrease as people choose to see films through other platforms. In my opinion, true film-lovers will never lose their interest in going to the cinema, as the sensation and the excitement of watching films in theaters are totally different.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | imurminhanh | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | ghazaleh Basiri | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | fowzan | 56 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sales Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 64
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 78
- The process below shows the process of growing and making products from pineapple Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 72
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2115942029 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73088091374 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602898550725 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1257252404 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.866666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177620640424 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624619049556 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606803832573 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130476302805 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752132047988 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2115942029 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73088091374 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602898550725 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1257252404 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.866666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177620640424 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624619049556 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606803832573 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130476302805 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752132047988 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.