Some people say that success is “10 percent talent and 90 percent hard work”. Is hard work the key to success, or is talent also important?
People have different views about what makes them successful. Some people believe that in order to achieve their goals, hard work is the most vital factor. In my opinion, beside being hard-working, talents also play an important role in making humans wealthy and recognized.
It is obvious that practice makes perfect. This means that if someone wants to reach their targets, he or she should devote themselves to work and try hard. For example, unless international footballers train themselves regularly, the chance of participating in large-scale matches is extremely low because they are not qualified enough. By practicing every day, not only their physical health but also their skills is improved. As a consequence, achieving success becomes easier.
However, not everyone who is dedicated can become rich or famous. In fact, talents are the key contributors to the fame of people in a variety of areas. In art, for instance, although some people spend a great deal of time working on their paintings or songs, it appears to be impossible for them to publish their artworks because of the lack of natural ability. To be more specific, apart from practicing, only when he or she has a beautiful voice that can touch people’s feelings, a singer cannot be popular with the public. Similarly, one can never be a well-known mathematician if he does not master calculation and algorithms.
In conclution, so as to become a successful person, global citizens are expected to have not only dedication at work but also genius.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-08 | Huyenlbg87 | 73 | view |
2021-06-08 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 84 | view |
2021-03-06 | Huyenlbg87 | 61 | view |
2017-01-12 | Justin | 66 | view |
2017-01-11 | saeed saamaadii | 61 | view |
- Some people say in order to prevent illness government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years 2000 2005 and 2010 The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below gives information on the global sales of hybrid vehicles between 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence, achieving success becomes easier. However, not everyone who is dedicated c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...lation and algorithms. To conclude, so as to become a successful person, global citi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, well, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11155378486 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8529568639 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661354581673 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.808290631 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6428571429 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237080202377 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734919169234 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691514467466 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144258843545 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598100679748 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.