some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. do you agree or disagree with this opinion
Some people argue that protecting wild animals and birds have taken too much attention and money from the public, I partly agree with this idea and also think that some particular concerns should be given to preserving these animals and birds.
On the one hand, I do not believe that it is human's responsibilities to protect wild animals and birds. The extinction of some certain species natural selection to choose the best individuals that give birth to the next stronger generations; as a result, all of this create the chain of natural development. Moreover, there are many aspects which directly affect human's benefits that people should be worried about such as the lack of food or natural disaster, these problems should be the priority and spent money on to tackle immediately
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why we should protect wild animals and birds. Firstly, some animals affect the balance of natural environment, and protecting them means the protection of natural surrounding as a whole. For example, if wild bees become extinct, flowers and plants will die out sooner or later because bees play a significant role in the production of flora. Secondly, the need to preserve endangered animals and birds is undeniable. Illegal hunting and the destruction of wildlife Inhabitat are way out of control. If the governments do not impose some regulations about these problems, the extinction of these creatures is just the matter of time, and the world will no longer see them again.
In conclusion, although I believe that we should pay attention to protecting wild creatures and birds to some extent, I also think that other problems such as drought and famine should be taken into account as well
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and spent money on to tackle immediately On the other hand, there are a variety o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01730103806 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67684577191 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536332179931 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7598838436 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289586556885 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106698700139 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113223563184 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189722168675 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125263795956 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.