“Some people say that tourism has many negative effects on the countries that people travel to.
How true is this statement? What can tourists do to reduce the harmful effects of tourism on local cultures and environment?”
It is true that tourists cause detrimental impacts on destinations they visit. In this essay, I will address the reasons of this and suggest what visitors could do to alleviate their harm on local cultures and environment
To begin with, tourism develops at the expense of the environment. Taking the cutting down tree as an illustration, to make place for building hotels, restaurants and so on, the local government is likely to destroy forest. And this could destroy the local ecosystem thereby leading to several environmental problems. Furthermore, tourists have a tendency to litter when there is no recycle bin, this does not matter to them since they do not care about local areas. Instead, it can threaten local inhabitants
Despite some detrimental impacts which stem from tourists, there are several positive things that tourist can do. First of all, tourists should raise their awareness of the environmental preservation through proper waste disposal before leaving their holiday destination. They have to look after the areas they stay and obey to its rules. Second, visitors try to avoiding going to a destination which is overcrowded. This can promise the minimization of air pollution in that area. Finally, tourists could use the environmentally friendly items when traveling in order to give a hand to protect our green shelter.
To sum up, the major environmental issues stem from human activities. However, it is beneficial for us raise our awareness of environmental protection especially protecting tourist locations and local environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stead, it can threaten local inhabitants Despite some detrimental impacts which s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, look, second, so, first of all, it is true, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37398373984 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99275349272 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638211382114 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2601945102 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188933193506 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605408394452 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603102803399 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118430217892 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654658651609 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.