Some people say that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places or crowded areas, while others disagree. Discuss and give your own opinion.
The question of whether to ban or to allow cell phones use in public or crowded places continue to be rather controversial. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will explain below.
On the one hand, proponents of mobile phones ban claim that using smartphones in public places would disturb the community in that place. To illustrate, was there a ringing of the phone in the cinema. this would disrupt the concentration of people who were watching the movie. In addition, it is often said that mobile phones take people's aware from some social crimes happen in public places. the reason given is that people would just focus on their gadget so could the theft steal their wallet.
On the other hand, critics of this policy highlight the advantages of mobile phones use in crowded areas. The example can be seen in organizing a big event where mobile phones could be a way to create good coordination among event committee. Moreover, another argument says that allowing cell phones use in public areas help people to call the police office when there is a crime around them. This crime ranges from stealing to fighting.
In summary, I would tend to side with the opponents of mobile phones use ban. It seems to me that not only allowing the use of mobile phone can create a good coordination in organizing a great programme but can help people to contact fast a police when they involved in social crimes as well. Of course, This is provided that people can silent their phone's ring if they are in public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether to ban or to allow cell phones use in p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e a ringing of the phone in the cinema. this would disrupt the concentration of peop...
^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... social crimes happen in public places. the reason given is that people would just ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in summary, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72014925373 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3883715981 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1334735316 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3571428571 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331874431048 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116236662074 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850183603056 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209360693233 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262203783408 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.