Whether to ban or to allow cell phones use in public or crowded places continue to be rather controversial. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will explain below.
On the one hand, proponents of mobile phones ban claim that using smartphones in public places would disturb the community in that place. To illustrate, was there a ringing of the phone in the cinema, this would disrupt the concentration of people who were watching the movie. In addition, it is often said that the prohibition of mobile phones take people's aware from some social crimes happen in public places. The reason given is that people would just focus on their gadget so could the theft steal their wallet.
On the other hand, critics of this policy highlight the advantages of mobile phones use in crowded areas. The example can be seen in organizing a big event where mobile phones could be a way to create good coordination among event committee. Moreover, another argument says that allowing cell phones use in public areas help people to call the police office when there is a crime around them. This crime ranges from stealing to fighting.
In summary, I would tend to side with the opponents of mobile phones use ban. It seems to me that not only allowing the use of mobile phone can build a coordination but can relate to people's safety as well. Of course, This is provided that people can silent their phone's ring if they are in public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... build a coordination but can relate to peoples safety as well. Of course, This is prov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in summary, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73122529644 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39457849222 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553359683794 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5350705345 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0769230769 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347851838052 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125760191992 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085743630766 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216397517113 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178886248761 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.