It is generally believed that people own too many alternatives in today’s world. I personally disagree with this opinion due to the advantages of choices that it brings about and I will explain below.
First and foremost, it appears that there are some proofs for where having many options would offer some advantages in people's life. The first opinion seems that, recently, many kinds of transportation which may become the alternatives when people want to go to same places could help people for traveling in the city and even in the world. These range from motorcycle to plane for far traveling. Furthermore, the last probable proof is related to the meals for many people. To illustrate, many types of cuisine in the world such as traditional food, international food, fast food, and many others could help people to eat a suitable taste for each person.
Looking from another perspective, it might be said that having too many alternatives would make a confusing and would take much time for people to decide on an important thing immediately. For instance, people would spare much time when they have to face the situation to choose which one the activity that they have to commit firstly. However, in my opinion, it would not be a big problem, if the person could manage their time and make a list of advantage and disadvantage of each option.
In summary, it is logical to conclude that too many alternatives are not a negative thing for many people who have many differences because these can be helpful for people to obtain the suitable thing that they need, such as transportation and meal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, for instance, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88321167883 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69506211346 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543795620438 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4524227386 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.636363636 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282894572382 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116539656237 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950244750635 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183804942438 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333531839938 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.