Whether to ban or to allow cell phones use in public or crowded places continue to be rather controversial. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will explain below.
On the one hand, proponents of mobile phones ban claim that using smartphones in public places would disturb the community in that place. To illustrate, was there a ringing of the phone in the cinema, this would disrupt the concentration of people who were watching the movie. In addition, it is often said that this prohibition would take people's aware from some social crimes happen in public places. The reason given is that people would just focus on their gadget so could the theft steal their wallet.
On the other hand, critics of this policy highlight the advantages of mobile phones use in crowded areas which are related to communication and coordination. The example can be seen in organizing a big event where phones could be a way to create good collaboration among event committee. Moreover, another argument says that cell phones use in public areas help people to make a fast call to the police officer when there is a crime around them, ranging from stealing to fighting.
In summary, I would tend to side with the opponents of mobile phones use ban. It seems to me that not only could the use of mobile phone build a coordination but could relate to people's safety as well. Of course, This is provided that people can silent their phone's ring if they are in public places.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 52
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case ? what can be done about this problem? 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...uild a coordination but could relate to peoples safety as well. Of course, This is prov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in summary, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76653696498 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50099224809 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6083663429 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319997086519 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120659899029 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761560768198 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201269261501 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102165171217 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.