The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The charts give information regarding the percentage of energy consumed and the proportion of the greenhouse gas emissions in an average Australian household. It is immediately apparent that the figure for heating shows its superiority over that for other energy consumptions. However, that for water heating dominates the greenhouse gas emissions in Australian household.
Regarding the energy used, heating -the greatest proportion in this sector- accounts for 42%. This is followed by water heating, other appliances, and refrigeration, which are recorded at 30%, 15%, and 7% respectively. Besides, the smallest proportion of energy consumption in Australian household is lighting (4%) and cooling (2%).
Turning to the emissions of the greenhouse gas in Australian household, water heating (32%) have the largest percentage in this category. Then, there is the smaller proportion for other appliances, heating, and refrigeration, which are while the former is listed at 28%, the two latter are noted at around 15%. In addition, the exception is for lighting and cooling standing at 8% and 3% each -the minimum emission of greenhouse gas in this area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the greatest'.
Suggestion: -the the greatest
.... Regarding the energy used, heating -the greatest proportion in this sector- accounts for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52542372881 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09563278213 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2195299591 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287925257595 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134779863733 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906623606587 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207468642457 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085026411459 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.