Some people say that we should not encourage sports games among schools because they lead to competition rather than cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sport competitions are not scarcely seen in almost all schools for the time being. While the rivalry that is believed to induce cooperation is advocated, opponents claim that they merely result in fierce competition among students. From my perspectives, I do believe the significant importance of sport games in building up positive competition as well as team work skills.
On the one hand, regardless of tensity levels of games, hostility between rivals is hardly witnessed at all. The main purpose of contests is to seek out the champion, which is a key driving factor to the ruthless performances of students. Hence, the students are understandably forced to fight with their best efforts to achieve the accomplishments. However, after cut-throat games, players are practically seen with hugs, handshakes and promising talks of upcoming matches. The existence of anger is just few and far between such friendly games.
On the other hand, sport games are also beneficial to students' competitiveness and cooperation. Firstly, it should be taken the positivity of competition into account based on the merits of motivation formation, which is well-assessed to drive students to challenges and triumphs. The victorious target would be likely to kick players beyond their safe territories. Not only games but also their academic learnings are the beneficiaries of this positivity. Secondly, a victory of team games such as football, basketball and volleyball requires strict collaboration among team members. Without a stern commitment of only a member to informed tactics, the team is likely to lose. Sport games apparently offer great opportunities for students' teamwork development.
In conclusion, I utterly approve of sport games among schools due to their benefits of competitiveness improvement as well as collaborative practices, notwithstanding infrequent ferocious attitudes. More importantly, the success of inter-school sport contests is subject to well-prepared organization boards of schools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67880794702 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31772382016 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619205298013 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6770568229 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.882352941 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176188634755 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052732014619 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536496718638 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107695658472 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652782351723 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.