Some people take temporary jobs, for they have time to do other things. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that these days many people have a tendency to choose short-term occupations so that they can have more spare time to concentrate on other things. I would argue that these advantages are outweighed by the disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are two main benefits when people take short-term jobs. Firstly, momentary jobs bring people more flexible time in terms of work schedule. That means they can make more time for their beloved as well as cultivate spiritual and social network, such as aesthetic values or philanthropic activities. For example, apart from being an English teaching assistant, I am also working as a volunteer in Hanoi Free Local Tours organization, where I can help the foreign tourists broaden their horizons about Vietnamese culture and custom. Moreover, by doing temporary work, workers can also get exposure to different workplaces and personalities. This helps them gain their work experience and adaptive abilities to a new environment.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that the disadvantages are more significant than such benefits. Primarily, a short-term career does not have job security. This means they even not only have an unstable income but also do not get the annual salary increments and benefits that regular full-time employees get. Take pregnant women as a convincing example. If they take a temporary job, they are not entitled to receive paid maternity leave around 20 weeks. In addition, there will be fewer career prospects. As a basic incentive system, a promotion at work intrigues employees to work efficiently. Therefore, without career prospects, workers can find no allure of putting a lot of energy and enthusiasm to have their tasks done effectively. This is likely having adverse effects on both themselves and the company they work for.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential disadvantages of contemporary job are more significant than the possible advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are outweighed by the disadvantages. On the one hand, I side with those who b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26265822785 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95502526741 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6640983328 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3888888889 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297312495288 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767125668159 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643372432317 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156528635294 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882828697211 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.