Some people tend to take temporary jobs, for they have the time to do other things. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that these days many people have a tendency to choose momentary occupations so that they can have more spare time to concentrate other things. Despite some obvious drawbacks of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are two major downsides when individuals take short-lived professions. Primarily, a temporary career does not have job security and the employers may be fired any time. They even not only have an unstable income but also do not get the annual salary increments and benefits that regular full time employees get. Take pregnant women as a convincing example. If they take a long-term job, they are entitled to receive paid maternity leave for around 20 weeks. In addition, there will be less chance of career prospects. As a basic incentive system, intrigue employers to work efficiently. Therefore, workers can find no allure of putting a lot of energy and enthusiasm to have their task done. This is likely to have adverse effects on both themselves and the company where they work.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that the benefits are more significant than such disadvantages. Firstly, momentary jobs bring people more flexible time in term of work schedule. That means they can make more time for their beloved as well as spiritual and social values, such as aesthetic values or philanthropic activities. For example, apart from being an English teaching assistant, I am also a volunteer in Hanoi free tour guide organization, where I can help the foreign tourists broaden their horizons about Vietnamese culture and custom. Moreover, by doing temporary work, workers can also get exposure to different kinds of workplace and personalities. This helps them gain their working experience as well as adaptive abilities to a new environment.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential advantages of contemporary jobs are more significant than the possible disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ry increments and benefits that regular full time employees get. Take pregnant women as a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ptive abilities to a new environment. In conclusion, it seems to me that the p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14197530864 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87434346029 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632716049383 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.007913094 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275534753819 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068412746673 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552660321061 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144666131039 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736831671932 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.